Aussie Nationalist Landmark Posts · Immigration/ Multiculturalism · Racial Tribalism and Conflict

Why Multi-Racialism Causes Violence


The dissident Right has consistently espoused the connection between multiracialism and societal conflict; while explaining little in the way of causation. It thus seems worthy to outline precisely why multiracialism causes violence, and consider relevant examples.

Taken together, there appears to be 3 core reasons that multi-racialism engenders violence.

First, when radically different groups inhabit the same territory (eg. blacks and whites), there follows a vast gulf in average IQ scores. From these differences, the higher IQ group axiomatically enjoys a superior economic and political standing– relative to the lower IQ group. From here, jealous, vengeful feelings naturally emanate against the more successful group, often culminating in violence. This clash is further worsened when knowledge of racial differences become taboo, leaving the lower IQ group to necessarily conclude the higher IQ group oppresses them through concealed, malicious means. Modern South Africa epitomises these tragic, although predictable consequences of having fundamentally different populations living alongside one another.

Second, when little is keeping people together in the way of genetic similarity, tensions can easily boil over between groups. For when divisions inherently exist as they do in race, a potential powderkeg of animosity in times of political, economic or cultural turmoil remains omnipresent. Surging anti-white rage which stems from differences instinctively felt by ‘People of Colour’, certainly reflects this.

Third and perhaps most importantly, multi-racialism causes conflict when groups compete in the same territory for power and resources, especially when societal hegemony becomes contested.

Before proceeding, a quick refresher on the field of group interests appears due. Because in-group preferences and exercising racial identity is “strengthening each party to a relationship and producing conditions of life that are better calibrated towards an identity, solidarity, survival, additional resources and the eventual replication of shared genetic interests,” this is adaptive human behaviour. For more, see ‘The Genetic Basis of Racial Tribalism’.

When groups are situated geographically close to each other in an inter-racial society, instinctual assertions of group power commonly wreak grizzly consequences. Consider the writing of Ron Chernow in Grant, who detailed the 1873 Colfax massacre:

After a federal judge ruled in favour of the Kellogg slate, the powder keg of Louisiana politics exploded in April 1873. William Ward, a black Republican, and Christopher Columbus Nash, a white Democrat, vied for control of Grant Parish in the centre of the state. Ward summoned his black supporters and warned them that Democrats would try to seize by force the county seat of Colfax, a lush place of swamps and bayous and a black Republican stronghold. To avert this, they threw up earthworks around the courthouse, guarding it for several weeks. This display of black power was anathema to the white community. On Easter Sunday, Nash led a mob of severe hundred whites, armed with titled and a small cannon, who opened fire on the courthouse, setting it ablaze. Even though its black defenders ran up a white flag of surrender and begged for mercy, the mob butchered dozens of them.

Whilst these were barbaric scenes, Colfax was the probable consequence of leaving 2 divergent groups that numbered approximately 50 % of the population, to freely struggle over political power and resources.

It is also worth noting that whenever inter-racial conflicts occur, questions of racial identity overwhelm all other considerations; as humans conform to innately held genetic interests. Mississippi’s Reconstruction era Governor Adelbert Ames, admitted this much in lamenting the tunnel-visioned grievance that white Democrats held at the time:

In one phrase- hostility to the negro as a citizen. The South cares for no other question. Everything gives way to it. They support or oppose men, advocate or denounce policies, flatter or murder, just as such action will help them as far as possible to recover their old power over the negro.

On whether there is a causal relationship between multi-racialism and inter-group violence, history affirms this reality and the coherent reasons for it. If Westerners perpetually reaffirm our post-1960 core values–multiculturalism (a frequent misnomer for multi-racialism), diversity and tolerance of such trends–these orthodoxies may inflict a sanguinary price.

4 thoughts on “Why Multi-Racialism Causes Violence

  1. I strongly agree with this and thank you for posting.

    I believe that there is an increasing number of people, especially in Europe, fed up with seeing their countries being taken over by non-European migrants, particluarly those who are Muslim and from Africa, South-east Asia and the Middle East. The fundamental question is: Why should these migrants have a right to live in Europe when they have so little in common with European social and cultural norms? Who authorises elected governments to grant citizenship to these people and what are the reasons underpinning this?

    Basically, the promotion of multiculturalism and diversity by the liberal pc politicans is in direct oppostion to nationalism and the politicians are encouraging their own citizens do disassociate themselves from the countries they live in.

    There will come a time when the migrant minorities begin to feel that their ‘culture’ is superior to the culture of the country that has adopted them and that this should not be challenged. This is also supported by the ruling authorities as it is in line with their philosophies. However, fortunately there now seems to be a momentum in Europe behind more nationalist political parties e.g. Italy, Germany, Austria who are taking a harder line on illegal economic migration and who are, more importantly, preparted to stand up against Brussels on this issue.

    Time will tell if Europe is able to remove those who do not shares its traditional values from its midst. If not, then it is highly likely in the future that clashes will take place between different factions in a quest to protect or assert their cultural and religious norms.

    1. Thankyou ivankinsman, it’s good to have you visit! I think your right– the more divided our societies become, the more these ethnic and religious minorities will grow emboldened in their campaign against the “patriarchal, oppressive, White supremacist” West. All societies have their breaking points, and are limited by how much diversity they can take. For now, things are comfortable enough for multiculturalists, as they preach Leftism from their safe, predominantly white ivory towers. But when multi-racialism truly comes to them and we increasingly resemble Haiti, they’ll all be awfully sorry.

Leave a Reply