Immigration/ Multiculturalism · The Donald Trump Presidency

The truth about ‘separating families’

Recent days have seen a renewed wave of media propagandising on US illegal immigration, in a similar manner to late 2015 inferences, which linked the flow of Muslim refugees to an upcoming holocaust-styled genocide (which unsurprisingly, never came to fruition).

But as the altruistic West is tormented with emotional blackmail to not ‘separate families’, we must remain level-headed and directed towards answering questions of truth.

And the prevailing truths are not that the US is cruel in ‘separating families’, or even that these vulnerable people were deliberately endangered by people smugglers.

Rather, the bigger picture of which these events are merely reflect, is the long term replacement of Western people where they exist.

So the pertinent question should not be one of ‘separating families’, as this notion will soon disappear from the public consciousness.

Instead, we must ask whether it remains legitimate for Western people to maintain a homeland of their own, in the very countries their ancestors founded.

For as the elites continue to evade this all-defining challenge, their moral objection to Western immigration restrictionism of any kind, becomes ever transparent.


“Trump and the Invasion of the West”, by Patrick J. Buchanan, June 19, 2018:

“It is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart,” says former first lady Laura Bush of the Trump administration policy of “zero tolerance,” under which the children of illegal migrants are being detained apart from their parents.

“Disgraceful,” adds Dr. Franklin Graham.

“We need to be … a country that governs with a heart,” says first lady Melania Trump. “No one likes this policy,” says White House aide Kellyanne Conway, even “the president wants this to end.”

And so it shall — given the universal denunciations and photos of sobbing children being pulled from parents. Yet striking down the policy will leave America’s immigration crisis still unresolved.

Consider. Since 2016, some 110,000 children have entered the U.S. illegally and been released, along with 200,000 Central American families caught sneaking across the border.

Reflecting its frustration, the White House press office declared:

“We can’t deport them, we can’t separate them, we can’t detain them, we can’t prosecute them. What (the Democrats) want is a radical open-border policy that lets everyone out into the interior of this country with virtually no documentation whatsoever.”

Where many Americans see illegal intruders, Democrats see future voters.

And with 11,000 kids of illegal immigrants in custody and 250 more arriving every day, we could have 30,000 in custody by summer’s end.

The existential question, however, thus remains: How does the West, America included, stop the flood tide of migrants before it alters forever the political and demographic character of our nations and our civilization?

The U.S. Hispanic population, already estimated at nearly 60 million, is predicted to exceed 100 million by 2050, just 32 years away.

And Europe’s southern border is more imperiled than ours.

A week ago, the new populist regime in Rome refused to allow a boat full of migrants from Libya to land in Sicily. Malta also turned them away. After a voyage of almost a week and 1,000 miles, 630 migrants were landed in Valencia, Spain.

Why did Italy reject them? Under EU law, migrants apply for asylum in the country where they first enter Europe. This burdens Italy and Greece where the asylum-seekers have been arriving for years.

Of the landing in Spain, Italy’s interior minister Matteo Salvini, a leader of the populist League party, chortled:

“I thank the Spanish government. I hope they take in the other 66,629 refugees (inside Italy). We will not be offended if the French follow the Spanish, the Portuguese and Maltese, we will be the happiest people on earth.”

If the migrants boats of the Med are redirected to Spanish ports, one suspects that the Spanish people will soon become as unwelcoming as many other peoples in Europe.

And Trump is not backing down. Monday he tweeted:

“The people of Germany are turning against their leadership as migration is rocking the already tenuous Berlin coalition. Crime in Germany is way up. Big mistake made all over Europe in allowing millions of people in who have so strongly and violently changed their culture!”

Whatever European leaders may think of him, many Europeans are moving in Trump’s direction, toward more restrictions on immigration.

In Germany, a political crisis is percolating. The Bavarian-based CSU, longtime coalition partner of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s CDU, is now talking divorce if Merkel does not toughen German policy.

Merkel has never fully recovered from the nationalist backlash against the million migrants she allowed in from Syria’s civil war. A New Year’s Eve rampage in Cologne, featuring wilding attacks on German girls by Arabs and Muslims, cost her dearly.

Among the reasons Bavarians are pulling away from Berlin is that, being in the south of Germany, Bavaria is a primary point of entry.

Virtually every one of the populist parties of Europe, especially of the right, have arisen to contest or to seize power by riding the issue of mass migration from Africa and the Middle East.

Yet the progressives adamantly refuse to act, apparently paralyzed by a belief that restricting the free movement of peoples from foreign lands violates one of the great commandments of liberal democracy.

We are truly dealing here with an ideology of Western suicide.

If Europe does not act, its future is predictable.

The population of Africa, right across the Med, is anticipated to climb to 2.5 billion by midcentury. And by 2100, Africa will be home half of all the people of the planet.

If but a tiny fraction of the African and Middle Eastern population decides to cross the Mediterranean to occupy the emptying towns and villages of an aging and dying continent, who and what will stop them?

Trump may be on the wrong side politically and emotionally of this issue of separating migrant kids from their parents.

But on the mega-issue — the Third World invasion of the West — he is riding the great wave of the future, if the West is to have a future.

6 thoughts on “The truth about ‘separating families’

  1. I’m in total agreement with your post, particularly the question of whether we as whites deserve or have a right to a country or an identity of our own. Of course you and I believe we do. And this has nothing to do with “racism”: I have no qualms with considering all races being equal and of equal value in the sight of God. But lets face it, the liberal world wants to destroy its own heritage, so some races and particularly religions must to them be considered far more equal than others. My own view is that underlying it all is a spiritual war being waged with the intent of reversing Babel, as recorded in Genesis. Whiteness is just too Christian and too Biblical for some people, and that’s the target of globalism, to my mind, and its goal is world government-ie tyranny.

    1. Ok, so you perceive the anti-white agenda as reflecting a wider anti-Christian agenda. If anything, I’d believe it to be the other way around, when you look at Christianity in Mexico, the Phillipines parts of Africa where the faith is not under attack. Nevertheless, you are right when you say ‘liberal world wants to destroy its own heritage’. This is very much the case, and there are many examples of this. When the Left says it is against ‘white supremacy’, this really means the preponderance of European people in any place. This was recently reflected by the New York Times, who equated reproducing white children with ‘white supremacy’.

    2. Good point, except I think they see their first objective as getting rid of white religion in the country which leads the world and “exports” it, then the rest will follow too. White religion is forced on the rest of the world by America, so stop the rot at the source, they think.

    3. Yeah alright, I see where your heading. I definitely agree with you on this: whites and Christians have both been lined up in the Left’s sight for eventual elimination. So they clearly share a common destiny in that respect.

  2. Excellent article summation of the problem.

    CA is already lost. The dems and Mexico can decide any vote. The dems are hell bent on turning the US into a 3rd world nation…just to get the vote. They should put up a wall around CA and NY and let the illegals freely invade these sanctuary cities.

    1. Yeah that would be ideal. I think it’s very possible in the future that the US will split up along racial lines. And Hispanics will clearly have California/ the US Southwest to themselves. Better off the US left them to their own devices, as the free loading can only last for so long until everything collapses.

Leave a Reply